Attention to Audience |
Did not attempt to engage audience.
|
Little attempt to engage audience
|
Engaged audience and held their attention most of the time by remaining on topic and presenting facts with enthusiasm
|
Engaged audience and held their attention throughout with creative articulation, enthusiasm, and clearly focused presentation
|
|
Clarity |
No apparent logical order of presentation, unclear focus.
|
Content is loosely connected, transitions lack clarity.
|
Sequence of information is well-organized for the most part, but more clarity with transitions is needed.
|
Development of thesis is clear through use of specific and appropriate examples; transitions are clear and create a
succinct and even flow.
|
|
Content |
Thesis is unclear and information appears randomly chosen.
|
Thesis is clear, but supporting information is disconnected.
|
Information relates to a clear thesis; many relevant points, but they are somewhat unstructured.
|
Exceptional use of material that clearly relates to a focused thesis; abundance of various supported materials.
|
|
Creativity |
Delivery is repetitive with little or no variety in presentation techniques.
|
Material presented with little interpretation or originality.
|
Some apparent originality displayed through use of original interpretation of presented materials.
|
Exceptional originality of presented material and interpretation.
|
|
Speaking Skills |
Monotone; speaker seemed uninterested in material.
|
Little eye contact; fast speaking rate, little expression, mumbling.
|
Clear articulation of ideas, but apparently lacks confidence with material.
|
Exceptional confidence with material displayed through poise, clear articulation, eye contact, and enthusiasm.
|
|